BizSphere
Solution
Services
BizSphere AG
BizSphere Blog

Knowledge Management, Sales Enablement, IT trends & innovation


Archive for the ‘Knowledge Management’ Category


A few days ago, I noticed the following discussion in the LinkedIn.com group “Sales Enablement Content“:

“Sales Enablement: People, Processes and/or Technology?

How do you view sales enablement? How is it weighted across the traditional “people, processes and technology” model?”

One of the responses was:

“There are numerous sales enablement “solutions” available, each of which claims to offer some unique value. Ultimately, what I find repeatedly, is that the content for any of these solutions is an afterthought. Buying decisions for sales enablement systems are based on the capabilities the system will deliver, primarily using existing content. But the source and format of that content will continue to require improvements if the full benefit of a sales enablement program is going to be realized.

Ultimately, sales enablement systems are a version of knowledge management tools. The remaining challenge is in how to motivate target users of that knowledge to find it and use it effectively.”

Here is my answer to both the initial question and the response above:

Jeanne Hellman, who wrote a comprehensive case study on implementing a Sales Enablement system and who I worked with on this very task at Nortel Networks, always adds “Content” to “People, Processes and Technology” and then calls it “The Four-Legged Chair Analogy”.

However, the observations above are correct with regards to how Sales Enablement solutions are being sold/bought. What I can say to this is that a good Sales Enablement system will give feedback in real-time regarding which type of content works and which doesn’t (based on many metrics like views, downloads, star ratings, comments, sharing, etc…). In addition, it will also have a dashboard/report for the owner of the Sales Enablement solution to show the gaps / what is missing:

E.g. the…

  • offering in the product portfolio,
  • sales region / country,
  • industry vertical,
  • customer pain point,
  • sales/buying cycle step,
  • content type/format,
  • etc…

…that does not have customized or fresh content.

All the quantitative feedback mentioned above together with the qualitative feedback from the social / 2.0 features will tell you where to spend your marketing dollars for content creation and where you can stop producing content, nobody uses.
matrixed organizations
Yes, we are talking about Knowledge Management tools. Yes, the biggest challenge is to motivate users to use them (instead of emailing each other) and to contribute their own knowledge back into the system (tribal knowledge). However, there are features like customized dashboards, daily newsletters or RSS feeds that show each person based on their interest or assigned lead in the CRM system what might interest them. Yes, you will have to start with existing content. However, making “Content, People, Processes, and Technology” your mantra, will make sure no area is left out and get you closer to realizing the full benefit of a Sales Enablement program.

Best regards,
Paul Krajewski

The blog post above is a personal statement from Paul Krajewski and does not necessarily represent the point of view of BizSphere AG.

Sales Enablement systems


TribalknowledgeTV just published a review of Sales Enablement systems. Find BizSphere included in this list of several Sales Enablement applications/solutions. They all have a lot of the same benefits and naturally a short post cannot go into the specific details of how one application is different from the other. A while back Scott Santucci, senior analyst at Forrester Research, said the following about BizSphere:

“Imagine a large company that can sell different combinations of products and services, and organize things in a variety of different hierarchies,” he says. “If we were calling on a c-level person about [her/his] particular business problem, it could span across multiple product lines. If you talk to a manager-level person, you may only talk about one particular product. How do we build a taxonomy that allows us to cascade and work within that complex an infrastructure? That’s what BizSphere does. [...]”


Focus.com (network of business and technology experts who provide questions and answers, research, and personalized support) recently called for contributions around best practices in Sales Enablement. I responded with the three best practices that can be found here.

One of my contributions has been chosen for inclusion in the 6 Best Practices in Sales Enablement: Strategies briefing. (You can download the PDF document for free.)

The other contributors who are cited in the Focus.com briefing document are: Bob Apollo, Dave Brock, Candyce Edelen, Michael Fox, Robert Koehler, Christian Maurer, Sharon Drew Morgen, Russell Palmer, Tamara Schenk and Tony Zambito.


On focus.com, LinkedIn.com and other places discussions about the definition of the term Sales Enablement keep on popping up. This question is from November 5, 2010:

“Sales Enablement – It’s not all the same. What does it mean to you?”
What do we mean by the term “sales enablement?” I was at an executive level meeting on Wednesday in the Silicon Valley area, where a comment was made by a senior VP of worldwide sales, that the term would need to be defined for the sales force, because it meant different things to different people. What does it mean to you?

Here is my answer:

Every analyst firm and every business has their own definition. On focus.com and LinkedIn.com you can find many of them. Some use a very broad and all encompassing definition, some a very narrow, and some do not use the term Sales Enablement at all. I like the saying “You are either in sales or you are in sales support!” Basically everyone in a business should make sure that those who directly touch accounts have more valuable conversations with them and have everything they need to close.

You can have philosophical discussions whether the “support”/”enablement” should be spearheaded by the sales leader or the marketing leader, you can talk about “sales and marketing alignment” or you can get to work and put people, content, processes and technology in place that make sure that everyone (no matter whether they report to global, a regional team, a product line or a business function) can contribute the following:

- Contact details of subject matter experts per specific intersection in the matrixed organization,
- Knowledge about up-selling&cross-selling opportunities,
- Knowledge about customer pain points in specific industry verticals,
- Tools (like ROI calculators),
- Insights from the field (like customized presentations that resonated well and why),
- Collateral / marketing assets (branding approved vs. generated in the trenches) in different languages
- Comments / blog posts / questions
- Leads
- Pricing information for specific scenarios
- News etc…

When everyone globally can access, contribute, rate, and comment in an “Enterprise 2.0″ fashion then all that searching and re-creating/re-formatting that costs your sales people so much time can be cut down and through the wisdom of the crowd they will be better prepared to face the buyer who thanks to “Web 2.0″ is also better informed than ever. Now that terms like “Buyer Enablement” start to emerge, the buyer who is in the driver’s seat will not put up with the generic pitch and only listen to sales people after a lot of research which means the questions asked will be so specific to the buyer’s pain point that only the sales person who can tap into the wisdom of his/her entire organization can answer them.

matrixed organizations

Important is that all this knowledge is not tagged/labeled/structured in random ways and not all thrown in the same pot. Only if you provide people a context and semantic structures to contribute into and search in, you will allow for the knowledge to be accessible and to become wisdom. Without a semantic (web 3.0) approach where the systems knows what kind of information it is storing you would not be able to do things like presenting a sales person with all collateral that make sense in the sales step he/she is currently in. If you left this up to free tagging/naming by the hundreds or thousands of people who contribute, you would never get consistency and always miss some collateral e.g. per sales step.


On November 4, 2010, Tom Pisello (The ROI Guy) wrote a long and comprehensive post entitled ‘IDC: Economic Buyers, Digital Overload and Sales Enablement Define Marketing for 2011′. Below is short portion of his post. You can listen to his full webinar ‘Capture frugal buyers with IDC Dynamic Reports’ as well as download the presentation.

One of the three Key Technology Marketing Trends for 2011 according to IDC is Investing more in Sales Enablement. It “is critical as buyers indicate that internal decision making is becoming more complex, while at the same time, sales professionals are not adding the needed information and value needed to overcome the growing buying cycle complexity. As a result, sales is being invited later into the decision making process, sales cycles are extending and deals are stalling.”

“[...] Is this digital spending allocation aligning with buyer needs? When asking over 200 IT buyers what they felt was most important part of the overall purchase process, over 1/3rd of the buyers indicated Vendor Content as key to the purchase decision. Content may indeed be king.

IDC survey results indicate that buyers rely on Vendor Content greatly, exceeding the value of direct vendor engagements with technical teams, sales representatives and executives in making key purchase decisions. With a wealth of information available at the click of a mouse, buyers are doing more of their own research and evaluations on-line relying less and less on vendor interaction to progress through the decision making cycle. We call this the “Internet fueled buying cycle.”

Content marketing, and developing content in particular to attract today’s economic focused buyer, is more important than ever to help connect and engage with buyers, and help customer stakeholders make better and faster IT purchase decisions. From these survey results, increased spending on content marketing for corporate web sites and social media would seem to help drive more / faster buying decisions. To help cut through the constant information overload, and help guide decisions more effectively, the most valuable content is that which is tuned to be relevant and engaging to the buyer – one-to-one personalized for example by industry, location, size, stage in buying cycle, role, pain points and opportunities.

The End of Sales as we Know It?
The importance of content marketing, from these survey results, help guide marketers that they should indeed be investing more in developing and delivering the right personalized and engaging content to help buyers drive decisions.

However, the importance of content and lack of priority towards direct engagements points to a troubling trend in that today’s Internet fueled, buyer controlled purchase process is disintermediating sales from the purchase process. Buyers are doing more and more of their own research in the early and middle phases of the sales process, and involving sales reps later and later in the sales cycle, often after key purchase decisions have already been made. Can sales be made relevant and valuable again in these key stages of the buying cycle?

The key to shaping the trends back in the vendors favor certainly requires an investment in content marketing, but also may mean investing more wisely in Sales Enablement to be sure sales is armed with the content they need to effectively engage buyers earlier, and with more value in the process.

Sales Enablement or Perish
Sales Enablement is defined by IDC as: “The delivery of the right information to the right person at the right time in the right format and in the right place … to assist in moving a specific sales opportunity forward.” [...]“


Follow us:

Copyright © 2012 BizSphere AG | www.bizsphere.com | Imprint and legal aspects
BizSphere, MySphere, ExpoSphere and ContentNuggets are Trademarks of BizSphere AG, © 2012 BizSphere AG