According to IDC, 57% of all clients feel sales people presenting to them for the first time are not very well prepared. At the same time, sellers spend more than a third of their working time searching for information and creating presentations to prepare for client meetings. And in addition to that, according to Forrester analysts, companies are spending around 135.000$US per year on sales support activities like sales collateral production, training or workshops.
So, something is wrong in the world of selling. Sellers seem to be overwhelmed by the huge amounts of information that are available to them while the right and useful information does not reach the buyers on the clients’ end. While companies have focused on optimizing the transactional sales process over the last years using CRM technologies and methods, the informational angle of selling has not really been in focus.
It is just consequent that major analyst firms like IDC, Forrester or Gartner have recently been starting to address this obvious problem in their research. Under the label of ‘Sales Enablement’, they are proposing that information relevant for sellers should be integrated alongside the sales process of a company. Such integration could guarantee that sales people always have the right information at their fingertips in any sales situation – to enable them to have a valuable conversation with their clients.
While this theoretically makes a lot of sense, reality in enterprises looks pretty complex. Here are a few reasons why:
- Relevant content is usually distributed across numerous intranet sites, databases or other repositories – just think about a seller, who has to access the customer reference database, the competitive intelligence site as well as the product information teamroom to gather everything he needs to prepare a client presentation.
- Content is created in author-centric patterns that make it difficult to effectively browse – this means that a marketing person, who creates a positioning paper, does not necessarily categorize and save it in a way a seller can intuitively find it.
- There’s no feedback loop between sales and marketing to comment or rate content.
- Beyond content integration and CRM alignment, there’s a variety of other marketing and sales processes that should become integrated more tightly – proposal generation, for example, can be optimized in most companies.
Nevertheless, companies should start focusing on Sales Enablement now – before the problems related to it get worse. I hope, this blog will become a platform for a lively and engaging exchange of ideas, thoughts and concepts around Sales Enablement. In the end, companies’ sales and marketing teams need to become more effective in all their efforts to provide better tailored solutions to and to have more quality discussions with their clients.
We have invited a lot of guest bloggers from universities, analyst firms as well as enterprises to share their views on Sales Enablement. Amongst others, the following questions will be discussed:
- How to effectively and sustainably integrate intranet-based content and communication silos?
- Once achieved, what additional content silos and sources could be integrated and which sales and marketing processes could be aligned?
- How can sellers retrieve content more intuitively and efficiently?
- Can intuitive user interfaces help sellers to better handle the growing complexity of enterprise portfolios and client needs to effectively facilitate successful client conversations?
- How can communication happening between knowledge experts across the company be turned into reusable and generally available information?
I am looking forward to exciting discussions over the next weeks and months!

See also:General







From Michael Kelly
President, CEO at ChoiceBridge Technologies
http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=375225&authToken=DiZU&authType=name
You probably are answering your own question but the answer is obvious.
Sales people are researching, true, but for what?
The problem that sales is constructing a presentation based on research that sales did to create sales. You should see the problem, it is going to be difficult for sales to not inject either their perspective into this or to get a clear understanding of the client perspective – because each client is unique even when seem alike.
The problem is that while there is indeed an overwhelming amount of information out there, how do you know which is relevant? where?
That is a difficult question because that is going to depend on the client, the challenges, the solution and most likely – background information that the seller never really gains a clear understanding of.
The perspective of the prospect/client is important if you are trying to somehow share how you are going to assist that client in addressing whatever business challenge they are facing.
The biggest problem that I have always had with CRM is that it is only one side of the equation. How the buyer engages, thinks, reacts and the like is essentially almost invisible – unless you consider the highly filtered contents notes of the CRM to be mineable/worthwhile.
If you want to point to where I think selling processes need assistance, they need more of the buyer’s processes transparent and visible. This assures sales are faster, it makes sure items sold are not a poor fit (and thus high support cost) and ultimately it makes sure both sides get what they want.
In a good sales process, both sides should have the same goals. If they don’t, that is part of the problem right there.
See original comment post at: http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers&discussionID=4602467&gid=57366&commentID=4639176&trk=view_disc