BizSphere
Solution
Enable Your Sales Blog

News, discussions and Opinions about Sales Enablement and Sales 2.0 as well as all updates on our Sales Enablement Solution Suite


Posts Tagged ‘conversation enablement’


A few days ago, I noticed the following discussion in the LinkedIn.com group “Sales Enablement Content“:

“Sales Enablement: People, Processes and/or Technology?

How do you view sales enablement? How is it weighted across the traditional “people, processes and technology” model?”

One of the responses was:

“There are numerous sales enablement “solutions” available, each of which claims to offer some unique value. Ultimately, what I find repeatedly, is that the content for any of these solutions is an afterthought. Buying decisions for sales enablement systems are based on the capabilities the system will deliver, primarily using existing content. But the source and format of that content will continue to require improvements if the full benefit of a sales enablement program is going to be realized.

Ultimately, sales enablement systems are a version of knowledge management tools. The remaining challenge is in how to motivate target users of that knowledge to find it and use it effectively.”

Here is my answer to both the initial question and the response above:

Jeanne Hellman, who wrote a comprehensive case study on implementing a Sales Enablement system and who I worked with on this very task at Nortel Networks, always adds “Content” to “People, Processes and Technology” and then calls it “The Four-Legged Chair Analogy”.

However, the observations above are correct with regards to how Sales Enablement solutions are being sold/bought. What I can say to this is that a good Sales Enablement system will give feedback in real-time regarding which type of content works and which doesn’t (based on many metrics like views, downloads, star ratings, comments, sharing, etc…). In addition, it will also have a dashboard/report for the owner of the Sales Enablement solution to show the gaps / what is missing:

E.g. the…

  • offering in the product portfolio,
  • sales region / country,
  • industry vertical,
  • customer pain point,
  • sales/buying cycle step,
  • content type/format,
  • etc…

…that does not have customized or fresh content.

All the quantitative feedback mentioned above together with the qualitative feedback from the social / 2.0 features will tell you where to spend your marketing dollars for content creation and where you can stop producing content, nobody uses.
matrixed organizations
Yes, we are talking about Knowledge Management tools. Yes, the biggest challenge is to motivate users to use them (instead of emailing each other) and to contribute their own knowledge back into the system (tribal knowledge). However, there are features like customized dashboards, daily newsletters or RSS feeds that show each person based on their interest or assigned lead in the CRM system what might interest them. Yes, you will have to start with existing content. However, making “Content, People, Processes, and Technology” your mantra, will make sure no area is left out and get you closer to realizing the full benefit of a Sales Enablement program.

Best regards,
Paul Krajewski

The blog post above is a personal statement from Paul Krajewski and does not necessarily represent the point of view of BizSphere AG.


Focus.com (network of business and technology experts who provide questions and answers, research, and personalized support) recently called for contributions around best practices in Sales Enablement. I responded with the three best practices that can be found here.

One of my contributions has been chosen for inclusion in the 6 Best Practices in Sales Enablement: Strategies briefing. (You can download the PDF document for free.)

The other contributors who are cited in the Focus.com briefing document are: Bob Apollo, Dave Brock, Candyce Edelen, Michael Fox, Robert Koehler, Christian Maurer, Sharon Drew Morgen, Russell Palmer, Tamara Schenk and Tony Zambito.


Here are three sales enablement best practices that I shared on focus.com.

1. Align the way you name and structure your portfolio of products, services and solutions across all your regions/countries as well as audiences. This doesn’t sound sexy but it is crucial. The bigger your enterprise is and the more mergers & acquisitions it has been involved in, the more likely you have confusion amongst your different audiences: Regional teams who translate materials into their respective language, partners/channels who you might have a somewhat disconnected portal for, new hires vs. experienced staff in your sales force, the rest of your workforce or the workforce of companies you merged with, and the public/customers/media/analysts. All these different audiences might use different (old) names to refer to the same product, service or solution, they might not be up to date on portfolio/company restructuring, they might try to sell or buy things you have discontinued etc… You might never get to a point where you present the same single one taxonomy to all audiences but at least align and update! Doing that allows for a mapping from customer needs / buyer pain points to your products/services/solutions.

2. Make sure all your sales people and partners/channels have visibility to all cross-selling, up-selling, and other relationships between products, services and solutions in order to make sure no opportunity to sell more is overlooked. Most enterprises fail at providing this kind of data in a complete way because they try to do it in (multiple) Excel files which just aren’t multidimensional and only show a (rarely updated) small part of the highly matrixed organization based on which line of business authored it.

3. Make sure that no piece of collateral and no product/service/solution ever exists without a clear way to contact different experts (product marketing, CI/MI, pricing expert, training expert, etc.) in each region/language. Are you sure everyone in your organization would know who to call for expertise of the kind A for product B, sold in industry vertical C, in language D, in country E, to global account F… Most corporate phone directories and intranets cannot be drilled down into like this. Can yours? When subject matter experts of different types are always shown with their contact details in the context of every piece of collateral and each product/service/solution then people can interact with them to ask questions, leave comments / blog posts… Basically all that knowledge is being created in context and nobody ever feels left alone without experts at their finger tips. Welcome to the Enterprise 2.0.


Relocation and new company name

“SVA-BizSphere AG” becomes “BizSphere AG” and relocates from Wiesbaden to Mainz

Stuttgart, October 27, 2010 — The international start-up company SVA-BizSphere AG which specializes on software and services solutions for enterprise sales and marketing organizations, changed the company name into BizSphere AG as of October 21st and relocates the management office from Wiesbaden to Mainz with the beginning of November. The company originally started 2007 as a spin-off of SVA GmbH. With the relocation and the new company name, BizSphere gives a clear signal for increasing its presence in the market. The previous change in the management board and its commitment to innovation and marketing weeks ago were the first steps of the company’s re-positioning efforts.

The new location in Mainz will be the biggest BizSphere location in Germany and will also serve as the executive management office. The headquarters’ location will remain in Stuttgart. “With this step we’ve made another important statement to firmly establish our market position”, says Jochen Moll, CEO of BizSphere AG. “The Rhein-Main area is a very innovative economic region and the new office location in Mainz helps us to take advantage of an excellent business infrastructure”, Moll emphasizes. “The new company name and the relocation to Mainz are milestones for the growth and development of BizSphere”, Sven Eichelbaum adds, Chairman of the Supervisory Board of BizSphere AG and Member of the Board of SVA GmbH.

BizSphere AG
BizSphere AG is a software and consulting company with its headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany. In 2006 “BizSphere” was established as a business unit within SVA GmbH, one of the leading system integrators in Germany. In 2007 this business unit became an independent legal entity as SVA-BizSphere AG, which is doing business under the name of BizSphere AG since October 2010. The company has a global presence with staff operating out of Germany (Stuttgart, Mainz, Hamburg, Munich) as well as Shanghai (China) and Toronto (Canada).
BizSphere AG has developed a software platform and consulting framework supporting companies in solving their Sales Enablement challenges. BizSphere Sales Enablement Solution Suite optimizes costs and the quality of existing information by effective structured content. With this solution, sales representatives are able to use the information they need according to their requirements and companies will be able to serve and fulfill constantly changing customer needs within reduced response time. The platform combines know-how in the areas of semantic and social web (Web 2.0/3.0) as well as innovative user interface design.

Further information:
http://bizsphere.com
http://bizsphere.com/blog
http://twitter.com/bizsphere
http://slideshare.net/bizsphere
http://youtube.com/bizsphere
http://facebook.com/bizsphere

Contact:
BizSphere AG
Marketing & Communications Manager
Tamara Vierling
Holzhofstr. 3
55116 Mainz
Germany
Mobile: +49(0) 172 39 67686
Phone: +49(0) 711 490 39 744
Fax: +49(0) 6131 49706 66
Email: tamara.vierling@bizsphere.com


I’m honoured that focus.com has asked me to be one of their experts. Today, I answered the following question on focus.com:

Is sales training a component of sales enablement?
Are sales enablement or sales training two different groups are they part of the same?

Here is my answer:

Sales training is without a doubt a very important component of sales enablement. In most enterprises there is no shortage of sales training. However, in order to really enable sales people and to protect them from information overload a proper sales enablement approach would align people, processes, content, and technology to answer…

…which sales training is best (maybe based on ratings)?
…what is the most current and what needs to be updated?
…which formats are available?
…in which languages is it available?
…for which customer needs, industry verticals or countries / sales regions is customized training available?
…what are the cross-selling, up-selling, etc. opportunities that need to be kept in mind?
…who are the specific subject matter experts and how can they be contacted?

If you present your sales training in these different dimensions and make it easy to find for each product, service or solution, your sales force will start to save time, have better informed meetings, win more often and increase the average deal size.

By mapping your sales training as described above and tracking ratings, downloads and search queries you will be able to identify gaps and see which of them are the most important to focus on. By allowing comments and user generated content, you will crowdsource a lot of valuable insights from the field.

Best,
Paul


My last post on the question where Sales Enablement lives got a comment requesting further clarification of the following graphic:

matrixed organizations

The comment was asking where to find sales people in the graphic and what the role of Sales Playbooks is. I have to admit that it is difficult to read, but the sales people are actually represented within the green area as indicated by the words Sales Force. (This is not a reference to salesforceDOTcom.)

This speaks to the point that sales people and the legacy sales portals, that are supposed to enable them, sit in between a highly matrixed organization on the one side and just as complex an organization on the client’s side. These legacy sales portals are one-dimensional (they fail to show content & contacts in the context of the highly matrixed organization and in context to what pain point on the client side is addressed) and there are often several portals as there are so many silos of information.

Each Sales Playbook is a great tool for a small subset of the sales force (as shown in the graphic), but comes out of one of the silos, fed by only some of the Product/Portfolio Marketing teams or one regional team. When all content (e.g. customer references from different regions or specific value propositions per industry vertical…) lives in a multi-dimensional business context like it is made possible in BizSphere (which was designed to cut across all silos), a completely customized Sales Playbook for any given sales situation can be auto-generated.

In contrast to legacy sales portals, BizSphere takes at least three dimensions into account. These could be:

  • Where is the seller going to a meeting? (Sales regions, countries…)
  • What does the seller want to sell (Portfolio of products, services and solutions.)
  • What does the seller need in order to be successful in the meeting? (Content types like white paper, case study, ROI-Calculator, contact details of a subject matter expert, etc…)

You might also want to define a taxonomy of customer pain points and map your products against those or add other dimensions that your company thinks in. BizSphere then lets you filter down by media type, language of the content, and/or the sales step you are in with the opportunity you are working.

The dimensions of sales enablement
  • Imagine the 1st orange arrow in the graphic above to be a customer reference from a Canadian client for a specific security solution.
  • Imagine the 2nd orange arrow to be the contact details of the sales engineer in South Africa who is the expert for a given service.
  • The 3rd orange arrow could be an ROI-calculator for the same service but it is really specific to the mining industry and therefore relevant in Western Australia.
    Can you already see how here the regional teams can have as much of say in which content is relevant for specific sales situations as the product marketing team?

    Can you get lost in BizSphere? No way, because nothing is easier than answering: What do I want to sell, where do I want to sell it and what would help me to close the deal? Once you set your context in these three dimensions you will have filtered down from thousands of marketing assets / pieces of collateral to only the relevant ones.


    On September 7, 2010, Eric Nitschke (Launch International) asked the following questions on the LinkedIn Group Sales Enablement Content. Please see my response below.

    “Sales Enablement: Where does it live?
    Several clients have asked us for best practices in sales enablement – specifically who owns it?

    I’d support our marketing colleagues who are trying to align selling messages with product positioning and messaging documents. Others on the training side would say that their training materials are the baseline for sales enablement. Finally, the “sales enablement automation” crowd would claim ownership of the process and fulfillment of sales enablement materials on their web-based or internally-hosted portals.

    So I ask YOU – learned Sales Enablement Content Group members: Where does Sales Enablement live?”

    Coming from the point of view of someone providing web-based or internally-hosted portals for Sales Enablement, I would not claim ownership. All stakeholders like product marketing, training, CI/MI, the teams for pricing and ROI / business case calculations, the customer reference database, corporate branding, MarComs, etc… should be invited… invited to house their content and – just as important – their contact details in that one joint portal.

    A portal… not for the sake of the technology or to have yet another portal… but… a portal to let all these stakeholders see which of their content works and which doesn’t (also which content is missing and which gets insightful comments as a feedback loop from the field or the channel back to corporate).

    When there is this one interface that cuts across all team sites and the silos the many regional or functional groups might have built with SharePoint or LiveLink or any of these solutions, your sales people and channel partners can – for the first time – see what is available for the given sales situation they are in. None of the stakeholders “owns” this more than the others and the portal just helps to filter by sales step, region, industry vertical, content type, etc… to make visible whether the sale is being enabled or specific content and contacts are missing.

    matrixed organizations
    The single biggest complaint about Sales Enablement, I hear from sales people is missing content… content that is more specific than the generic pitch. A portal, that comes along with all stakeholders agreeing on content governance, a life-cycle duration for the content and responsibilities to respond to feedback & requests, will first of all make these gaps painfully visible and then guide the content planning to invest marketing’s dollars as effective as possible.
    To come back to your question, in some organizations it might be the CMO and in others the sales leader or portfolio manager – who is the executive sponsor, who aligns all the stakeholders to feed the new portal and shut down the old ones.

    Just a few days ago Joe Galvin from Sirius Decisions wrote about how important Social Media – as an approach for better internal collaboration – is as part of a Sales Enablement strategy. I think he is absolutely right. What used to be the informal coffee corner chat before nowadays is mimicked in Social Media platforms. Over time, people will learn that even within an enterprise the sharing of information is beneficial for everyone in the end. Yes, there may be a lot of sceptics around, especially in sales teams, but with the right programs and incentives offered, they will make the jump to the new social collaboration paradigm.

    However, the flip side of extensive social collaboration might be the appearance of new information silos as well as growing information overload. Without the social collaboration being moderated to a certain extend, it might lose some of its potential impact on the overall performance of the sales teams. Aaron Roe Fulkerson discussed this in a recent blog post: “The importance of context: why Enterprise 2.0 still fails to deliver value”.

    semantic web 3.0 BizSphere Knowledge Management methods

    A company might use a lot of different types of social collaboration platforms – the challenges is: How can they be orchestrated in a way, that actual knowledge exchange is taking place across existing team and functional structures? And how can the content generated be aligned to some generally agreed upon enterprise structures? What companies, that are serious about implementing a Social Media strategy for sales, should think about, is to create and maintain an enterprise context. Then collaboration can take place within this context and will add greater value to a broader audience. Ideally, the enterprise context should constantly evolve based on feedback gathered during the ongoing social collaboration (for example as shown below).

    Enterprise 2.0 with BizSphere

    Best regards,
    Matthias Roebel


    Alan Willis of Solutions for Sales (www.SolutionsForSales.com @salesready) wrote a detailed and insightful post entiteld ‘Sales Enablement Platforms – needs and benefits’. Solution for Sales is one of our trusted partners in the UK and one of the pioneers of the term ‘Sales Enablement‘. While at SVA-BizSphere AG, we provide technology and methodology to clients so that their sales force is able to access the most relevant information to their current sales situation, Solution for Sales creates this information for its clients. Their interactive sales kits have become an industry standard. Especially through this synergy, we are looking forward to a mutually productive partnership with Solution for Sales.

    Thanks to Solution for Sales for allowing us to re-post their article on our blog. It describes the sales enablement theme from a business perspective and greatly compliments the articles on our page:

    “Salespeople volunteer for a tough job. The complexity of what they sell and the sophistication of the people they sell to increase year by year. In this environment every sales interaction and conversation is important, which is why the best salespeople spend so much time preparing for their conversations with customers and creating the materials they will use.

    But salespeople are often not well served by the resources they are given to prepare for these conversations. The problem resides at two levels: the quality of sales materials is often poor and it is hard to find the right resources, even if they do exist. The concept of the sales enablement platform – a knowledge management tool for sales – has arisen as a solution to the second of these problems. This article outlines the requirements for an effective sales enablement platform and analyses the benefits.

    What customers want

    Customers have grown out of having products sold to them; they have even tired of solutions selling. Now they want to buy on the basis of business outcomes. The communications company doesn’t want an improved customer loyalty system; it wants customers that stay longer and spend more. The manufacturer no longer wants an improved supply chain solution; it wants lower supply costs and on time delivery. And they want to look at all the options for achieving their desired outcome.

    One consequence is that customers expect salespeople to explain how they can deliver outcomes. They are looking for salespeople to share a point of view, not just ask questions.

    Customers want to work with salespeople who bring business knowledge from a wide range of different situations; salespeople who can contribute new business ideas.

    What salespeople need

    The sales cycle can be viewed as a series of interactions or conversations with the customer. Each sales interaction has a specific set of objectives: it must change a viewpoint, unearth information, resolve a concern, solve a problem or provide needed information. Knowing this, and understanding the customer’s expectations, it is apparent that the salesperson, when preparing for a sales conversation, needs to be able to marshal a wide range of information and structure it according to the context and objectives of each different situation. Salespeople need better information systems to help them do this, and the sales enablement platform has evolved to address this need.

    What’s the problem?

    Typically, current tools do not meet the information needs of salespeople – see below “What salespeople say they need”. These shortfalls are damaging because salespeople rely on sales resources to fuel the engine of sales conversations – no fuel, no progress.

    What salespeople say they need

    • One source – I don’t want to have to search through multiple, unconnected information silos, arranged arbitrarily e.g. according to product set, department, country
    • The big picture – I need the high level view so I can spot related offerings and cross and up sell opportunities
    • Concise and complete – I want just the resources that are relevant now, not loads of extraneous stuff. But it must be all the resources, from all departments
    • Arranged for me – I don’t want to have to be an expert on the portfolio to get to the resources I need
    • In my language – it must respond to the words I use
    • Responding to the sales context – e.g. the stage of sale, technical vs business
    • Linking me to people who can help – I want to connect to salespeople who have been here before me, and to the expert behind the resource
    • Listening to me – I’d like the opportunity to comment and share information. I’d like to be updated on topics that I choose

    The impact – sales efficiency

    Much has been written about the impact of these problems on salesforce productivity. For example, IDC research says that on average each week a salesperson spends:

    • 6.4 hours creating presentations
    • 5.8 hours searching for client-related information
    • 2.3 hours searching for marketing collateral

    Clearly, if these processes could be speeded up sales would be more efficient. For example, for a salesforce of 500, saving one hour each week is worth over €500k each year in simple efficiency savings. That means getting more sales out of the same size salesforce or accommodating salesperson wastage without loss of sales.

    Significant as this is, Solutions for Sales believes that it is the potential improvement in sales effectiveness delivered by the sales enablement platform that offers the most significant gains.

    The impact – sales effectiveness

    We have argued that customers expect a higher quality of interaction with their sales contacts. They want business advice; they want a balanced view; they want to focus on their desired business outcome not the salesperson’s desired sales outcome. To meet these customer expectations salespeople need to tap into a wide range of resources and quickly find all that is available to make the next sales interaction successful.

    This is something salespeople are not doing well according to statistics from IDC, which show that:

    • 33% of all unsuccessful deals could have been won if the seller had been better informed and had acted more client-oriented
    • 57% of customers feel that salespeople are poorly prepared or not prepared at all at initial meetings
    • More than 50% of customers expect salespeople to be better informed about client-specific requirements and goals

    If accessing sales resources is difficult or laborious, it is our experience that the salesperson’s patience runs out long before all relevant resources have been discovered. The result is sales meetings that fall into the 57% that customers judge to be poorly prepared and sales opportunities that end up in the 33% that would have been won if the salesperson had been better informed.

    The most significant benefit of a good sales enablement platform is that it improves the quality of the sales conversation, which results in more wins. When it comes to quantifying this benefit there are so many other factors at play that it is hard to provide objective figures. Readers must judge for themselves, but if it is accepted that salespeople who are better prepared for sales meetings can achieve a 1% higher win rate, then for a company with sales of €250 million the result would be an extra €1.5 – €2.5 million of sales each year. And there’s another important benefit: the salesperson that demonstrates the ability to talk outcomes with their customer gains visibility of more sales opportunities.

    Marketing has needs too

    Sales enablement platforms are not just for sales. Marketing has a whole range of requirements in this area. See below:

    What CMOs say they need

    • Drive Sales – I need to have better ways of steering Sales in the direction the company wants to go
    • Satisfy Sales – I want to provide the sales resources that salespeople need. I am sick of hearing them say that Marketing is no help
    • Economise on Marketing resource – I would like to know which resources are valued by sales so I can save money by stopping doing what’s not wanted
    • Improve visibility – I want to see who’s using what, which resources are getting old, and what the coverage is of sales resources across the portfolio
    • Develop a broader view – I’d like people to have a better understanding of the breadth of our capability and the positive synergies across our portfolio
    • Exploit all our resources – I want everyone to be able to contribute to selling, including organisations like professional services and delivery
    • Encourage interaction – I need to get salespeople sharing their experience and marketing people contributing their knowledge directly to sales
    • Structured, uniform and global – I’m worried that the ad-hoc social networking and web tools that are springing up will just create confusion. Worse, if they aren’t maintained they will mislead

    Producing the best sales resources

    People all round the company have information that can help sales. Of course the main producers are Products, Marketing and Sales themselves, but there are others. In some companies Professional Services and Consulting divisions have information on the services they offer, their expertise and their processes, methods and tools. They may produce opinion pieces and white papers. This is valuable material in a complex sales process. Delivery and Operations can provide performance statistics and quality measures that are useful sales ammunition, and customers want to know about the design, implementation and support services available to them.

    Products, Marketing, Sales, Professional Services, Consulting, Delivery and Operations will all have their own ways of producing and storing information – this is what created the silos in the first place. The good news is that these don’t have to change. The sales enablement platform spans all these sources, presenting sales materials from all departments as an integrated whole. As well as giving 360° visibility, the sales enablement platform helps producers by providing:

    • Structure: defining the types of resource salespeople need; formats; desired content
    • User feedback: comments from salespeople on how resources can be improved and what new resources are needed
    • User rating: rating and usage statistics allow producers to judge how well they are doing and allow managers to identify the best producers and the most popular types of resource
    • Inventory control: to highlight when resources need updating or are approaching end-of-life, and show where more resources are needed

    The result is a continuous improvement cycle that leads towards better quality sales resources which are more useful to salespeople.

    Sales enablement in context

    The selling process can be viewed as a series of conversations between salesperson and customer, so the job of sales enablement is to make those conversations more interesting and ultimately more rewarding for both parties.

    When preparing for a sales call, the salesperson needs sales resources that are appropriate to the specific conversation being planned. Successful companies make sure that high quality sales resources exist, and they make it easy for salespeople to find the right resources for the job at hand. The sales enablement platform solves the second of these problems. It gives sellers access to the right sales resources and information – the fuel that powers the engine of sales. Moreover, it helps improve the quality of sales resources by creating channels for feedback and engagement so that content producers get a better understanding of what’s needed.

    Conclusions

    The sales enablement platform is a strategic tool that CMOs can use to define the portfolio structure, drive sales behaviour and optimise product marketing resource. It cuts through organisational silos and allows every department to play its part in supporting sales. It fosters business networking amongst salespeople and with other departments that have a major impact on sales, such as Marketing, Operations and Professional Services. It improves the quality of sales resources by facilitating feedback and engagement between users and producers. For all these activities it provides a structure that is uniform, maintainable and scalable.

    For the Sales VP, the sales enablement platform facilitates better execution in the everyday work of the salesforce, leading to lower sales costs and a higher win rate. The result is a solid business case for investment, which explains why the sales enablement platform is taking its place alongside CRM and marketing automation as a must-have business tool.

    This article was written by Alan Willis of Solutions for Sales. For more information email or call +44 (0)1702 586742.”


    Just a few days ago, I had a very interesting conversation with the Sales Leader of a large IT distributor. In the past they’d naturally been focusing on optimizing their distribution processes from vendors to resellers. However, as IT products are more and more becoming a commodity and supply chains and ordering processes have become more and more streamlined over the years, there is pressure to think about some differentiation against their competitors.

    One aspect brought up in the discussion by the Sales Leader is to start focusing on the actual knowledge delivered around the products, services and solutions distributed. Here we’re not just talking about speeds and feeds, but about how to effectively communicate which products, services and solutions are addressing which specific customer needs. Delivering such value to resellers means that they could better serve their customers, which eventually will make all parties involved happy. In a way, the Sales Leader said, it’s about to setting up a content logistics framework.

    Yet, setting-up content logistics like this is more complicated than you might think, as knowledge can’t be forced into transaction-oriented systems and processes. The reason is, that content is something multi-dimensional – its meaning depends on the situational context it is applied in. Only if applied in the right way, content turns into knowledge and eventually into a successful conversation with the customer.

    In order to successfully implement a content logistics framework a variety of ingredients are important. ‘Content needs’ have to be defined, content production responsibilities need to be assigned, ways of content delivery should be thought through end-to-end… just to mention a few things that need to be put in place. To make the whole model work in the long run – to match actual customer needs for the right information with the content delivered to them by the reseller’s sales teams – the content logistics framework should be based on a semantic knowledge management framework.

    Well, you might think, this sounds complicated, like trying to boil the ocean. I can tell you, the opposite is the case once you’ve got your head around it – I’d be more than happy to discuss this in more detail with everyone interested.


     

    0

    BizSphere: Bizsphere AG heute in Köln auf der cologne IT summit_ http://t.co/EDfepARu 2011-11-14T10:42:19+00:00


    Follow us:

    Copyright © 2009 BizSphere AG | www.bizsphere.com | Imprint and legal aspects
    BizSphere, MySphere, ExpoSphere and ContentNuggets are Trademarks of BizSphere AG, © 2009 BizSphere AG